Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
 
 
Media Backspin
« Do Jews Really Control the News Media? | Main | Your Daily Dose of Photo File Bile »

Wednesday, October 6 2010

Photo File Bile

On slow news days, photojournalists often go out and shoot photos of different things that catch their eye.

It gives them a chance to see things that would otherwise be overlooked while on other assignments, work a little more creatively, and -- importantly -- it helps build up and update a news service's bank of file photos.

File photos help papers illustrate certain stories or updates that don't lend themselves to a "breaking photo." They also give editors the option to update readers with a simple photo and caption explaining what's new.

So, for example, quality images of the Singapore skyline, a speeding truck, a German car exhibition, or even a folder may not be in high demand when the photographer goes out, but they can be useful months or years later.

But what happens when the photo has a particular agenda? That's the question I'm asking after seeing this:

Burin

Over looked by the Har Bracha Jewish settlement, a mineret is under consruction in the Palestinian village of Burin in the Israeli occupied West Bank, several kilometers from the northern city of Nablus on October 4, 2010, which the Jewish settlers are trying to block. The International Court of Justice and the international community consider the settlements being buildt in the West Bank to be illegal. (AFP/Jaafar Ashtiyeh)

The imagery consists of a Palestinian town's minaret overshadowed by an ominous Israeli settlement lurking above. The minaret is a symbol of Islam, the scaffolding a sign that not all is well. Har Bracha is close enough to be identifiably Israeli and modern, but far enough away to suggest something monolithic and faceless.

The image, in and of itself, isn't newsworthy. It's merely a vehicle for a caption reinforcing the view that settlements are illegal. And now, the image joins AFP's collection of file photos . . .

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e20133f4e179de970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Photo File Bile:



 

Comments

It is nothing new . The PLO has the best publicity group going.

First of all, the photo you posted is too small to be sure of anything.
From what I can make out, the mosque is overshadowing some unknown homes. That is all.
I do hope Israel is also building up a large, useful stock of photos. If not I volunteer to come there and spend all my time taking relevant pictures. I have the equipment and the know how.

Mickey Oberman

While I am certainly sympathetic for looking for media bias, I kind of agree with Mickey. The scene to me said, "it's nice to see shiputzim in an Arab village; it's a scene of normality." I did not get a sense of foreboding.

Mickey and H Lehman, What about the caption?

I see anti-Israel bias all the time in the media, but this example seems pretty weak. In fact, my first impression was that the scaffolding indicated construction...that the settlement isn't impinging on Muslim life at all.

HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin