Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
 
 
Media Backspin
« Mike Wise's Whale of a Fail | Main | Hamas Confirms: No Distinction Between Civilian Cops and Qassam Brigades »

Sunday, September 19 2010

Al-Ahram Editor Doth Protest Too Much

Osama Saraya, the chief editor of Egypt's state-run daily paper, Al-Ahram, lashed out at critics of last week's doctored photo of the White House summit.

I haven't found an English translation of Saraya's thin-skinned Friday column, so The Daily News of Egypt will suffice for now:

Al-Ahram chief-editor Osama Saraya wrote in an editorial Friday that altering the image wasn’t meant to distort the truth but to illustrate the leading political role of Egypt’s president.

Explaining that the photo was published in its original format earlier in the month, Saraya stressed that the paper doesn’t lie or alter the truth. He accused his critics of violating the ethics of the profession by the pointing the change in the photo.

“The published photo is illustrative; so those who don’t understand could,” he wrote, saying the critics shouldn’t mislead others by “claiming to have uncovered a hoax. . . . They are the ones who mislead, who lie, and who believe themselves, then accuse us.”

Illustrative purposes only? The doctored image wasn't labeled as such, which makes it misleading. Had the image of Mubarak's so-called "leading political role" been expressed, for example, as a painting, cartoon or sketch, nobody would've cared except for the poor artist left to fight for his paycheck.

More revealing is Saraya's blowback. If the image was really for illustrative purposes, a grudging boilerplate clarification proabably would've left the issue pushed off and buried. Methinks the editor doth protest too much.

If you haven't seen the images yet, here's the reality:

Wh_real

And here's what the state-run paper calls an illustration:

Wh_fake


Illustrative purpose. Yeah, right.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e20134877c0aba970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Al-Ahram Editor Doth Protest Too Much:



 

Comments

HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin