Is there really a moral equivalence between the Berlin Wall and Israel's security fence? Steve Bell of The Guardian certainly thinks so:
Unfortunately, he's not the only one. HonestReporting Canada already addressed similar spin at the CBC. And Jordan's Queen Rania writes at the Huffington Post:
Today, we celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall; next year, we will celebrate the end of Apartheid in South Africa. These two events taught us that when barriers are removed - whether physical barriers, legal barriers, or the walls people build in their hearts - the ground is laid for progress, peace, and development for both sides. The people of my region yearn as well for justice and reconciliation.
What better way to honour these anniversaries than to tear down another wall?
But Eldad Beck explains why Bell, the CBC and the queen's comparisons are, uh, off the wall:
Apart from certain visual similarities, there is no connection between the Berlin Wall and the security fence.
The Berlin Wall separated members of the same nation who aspired, to some extent or another, to reunite in a joint political framework. Meanwhile, the security fence marks, to some extent or another, a future border between two nations that do not wish to coexist in one state, but rather, to split their shared land into two separate states.
It is surprising that precisely those who for a long time fought for the Palestinian right for their own state now demand to dismantle the security fence. After all, this fence pushed the Palestinians closer to geographical and political division that would constitute a basis for a separate political entity.
Charges regarding the “apartheid fence” reveal the true motives of the Palestinians and their supporters, who are uninterested in dividing the country and co-existing alongside Israel; rather, they are interested in taking over the entire land.
Let's face it, as a protection from terror, the wall works, but don't take my word for it. Islamic Jihad chief Ramadan Shalah gets it.
Beck refers to another barrier, which only the Arab world can tear down:
There is another wall in the Middle East which objectors to the security fence refuse to see, not to mention fight against, even though it is this wall that perpetuates the conflict between Jews and Arabs: The wall of boycotts and isolation imposed by most of the Muslim world against Israel since its establishment . . . .
As long as this wall exists, the sides would not be able to get to know each other and it would be impossible to counter the bias that fans the flames of this conflict. The “Middle Eastern Wall” had been established much before the security fence and it bears absolute responsibility for the security fence’s existence.
I wonder if it means anything to Bell, the CBC and Queen Rania that November 9 isn't a German national holiday -- the Times of London, to its credit, notes that this it's also the anniversary of Kristallnacht.
Update November 12: They just don't learn. HuffPo published yet another commentary equating the two barriers.
Posted at
02:15 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e20128757a3cd2970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Off the Wall:
Comments
Another difference between walls: The Berlin wall kept people IN for the purpose of propping up an totalitarian system of government, and the Israeli security wall/fence keeps OUT terrorists who seek to kill their Israeli brethren as well as Israeli Jews.
No comparison at all.
Posted by: rob at Nov 11, 2009 4:36:44 PM
Queen Rania's nation forbids Jews to be citizens, making Jordan itself a true apartheid state, and yet the huffington post deems this individual worthy of expressing an opinion moralizing on Israel's security fence. This is why I despise the liberal media.
Posted by: Laura at Nov 11, 2009 6:58:52 PM
A lie:
"The Berlin Wall separated members of the same nation who aspired, to some extent or another, to reunite in a joint political framework. Meanwhile, the security fence marks, to some extent or another, a future border between two nations that do not wish to coexist in one state, but rather, to split their shared land into two separate states."
Ok, not quite a lie, since the author is careful to write "to one extent or another". All things being relative, one might also say...
