Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
 
 
Media Backspin
« Al-Jazeera English Hits US Airwaves | Main | 100 Most Influential Jewish Twitterers »

Thursday, April 30 2009

The Casualty Crunch

Percentage Since the Gaza war, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights’ casualty figures (pdf format) have been accepted by the MSM as gospel, or at least as a counterweight to Israeli findings. While the question of how many people were killed is still disputed, another question remains: how many of the Palestinians killed during Op Cast Lead were really civilian?

Elder of Ziyon pored through the PCHR findings, comparing the PCHR’s names with info available on public web sites. (See EoZ's subsequent updates 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). He determined that at least 459 of the PCHR’s “civilians” were in fact combatants.

Now, recently released research by the Institute for Counter-Terrorism concludes that the PCHR misidentified 314 Palestinian combatants as so-called civilians.

You'd think a story as fundamental as "who really died" would be of more interest to the Western journalists. Why are they abdicating their responsibility to bloggers think tanks and NGOs?

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e201156f6a6238970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Casualty Crunch:



 

Comments

Correction: Total of 459 militants so far (now up to 461,) 226 were called "civilians" by PCHR.

Thanks for the link!

So, let's see . . . 1,415 Palestinians are killed, of which you say as many as 461 were "militants." And your quibble is that PCHR may have exaggerated the number of civilians on the list?

I'm grateful for your clarification because now I feel MUCH better knowing that if fully 1/3rd of those killed were actually military personnel, that justifies not only those deaths but also the deaths of the other 2/3rds. I mean, if PCHR is going to lie about who's a civilian and who's not, what else might they be lying about?

HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin