Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe to MyMSN
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
Media Backspin
« The Independent's Character Assassination | Main | CBC Bans Anti-Semitic Comments and Commentators »

Thursday, March 5 2009

BBC's Bulldozes Headlines Again

If there's a bulldozer rampage in Jerusalem, count on the BBC to botch the headlines. Two separate attacks might be an unhappy coincidence, but with another attack today, the BBC proved three's a trend.

Here's the evolution of the Beeb's headlines. The first headline emphasizes a dead driver, not the nature of the terror involved.


This new headline shortly afterwards was nothing more than a semantic twist on the same problem.


Last I looked, this was the new BBC headline. It finally reflects that this was an attack, but why the quote marks?


As we pointed out last July the BBC's initial instinct is to portray Israel as an aggressor and a Palestinian as a victim even if that Palestinian was actively involved in a terrorist attack against innocent civilians.

The fact that the headlines were changed at all shows that somebody thought about what was going on. Too bad it took so long . . .



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BBC's Bulldozes Headlines Again:



Its hard for me to understand how HonestReporting can define this as a "botch."

I was never aware of that sort of behaviour.
That's really interesting to watch!

This is absolutely par for the course with the BBC who are quite clearly biased against Israel and pro- Palestinian. What is particularly annoying is that I am forced to pay the TV license fee for this bias on pain of being criminalised if I don't.

Isn't the real outrage that the driver wanted to kill a busload of young girls? That should be the headline? Why isn't everyone including Honest Reporting focusing on that? Imagine if an Israeli had tried to kill a busload of Palestinian kids. It would be front page news across the world. We were very lucky that the police killed the guy and that the pole stopped a true tragedy from happening. These terrorist have absolutely no soul and no conscience. That is the story here.

How is a two hour correction to a headline qualified to be commented as: ¨Too bad it took so long...¨?

Have you got any more examples showing their approach?

HR Links

HR Social Media

Featured Blogs

Featured Links

Media Backspin