Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
 
 
Media Backspin
« Blog Notes | Main | Lords Rule Balen Report Wrongly Blocked »

Tuesday, February 10 2009

MSM's 5 Election Spin Games to Beware

Ballot_boxes2 1. If Benyamin Netanyahu wins: By voting for Bibi, Israelis have turned their backs on peace.

This is a sweeping generalization about the Israeli public, which remains committed to a lasting peace based on a two-state solution. Since Oslo, governments run by Labor, Likud and Kadima have accepted this, differing only in how to approach the goal, not questioning its desirability.

It's worth noting that in 2001, the MSM demonized Ariel Sharon in a similar way, but by 2006, made a complete U-turn.

2. If Tzipi Livni wins: Livni and Barack Obama are the best hope for Mideast peace.

Whether or not this statement proves true remains to be seen. I'm more concerned that this dangerously raises expectations of Israel among Palestinians. Israel's relationship with the US is very important, but Livni's legacy as a peacemaker will ultimately hinge on the relationship she forges with a credible Palestinian leader, should one emerge.

3. If the results give Israel Beiteinu new political clout: Avigdor Lieberman is kingmaker because Israelis are racist.

Israel Beiteinu's surge in popularity and the intricacies of Israeli coalition politics indeed make Lieberman a likely kingmaker and a legitimate news story. The statement's fallacy is that a party expected to snag 15 percent of the Knesset suddenly represents Israel despite the other 85 percent who voted for anyone else.

4. If voter turnout is small: The winner has no legitimate mandate to govern.

In Israel's multi-party system, nobody gets an outright majority. And because Israelis have the right to not vote, newspapers can crunch the numbers in dramatic ways, like when The Guardian wrote in 2001:

Of 4.5m eligible Israeli voters, only 1.6m backed Mr Sharon. Should all Israelis be condemned by the minority's foolishness?

5. This election is The most crucial in Israeli history.

Big yawn. The press declared the same thing in 2006, 2003, 1996, 1992 . . .

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e201116853c059970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference MSM's 5 Election Spin Games to Beware :



 

Comments

Saying that Israel is our home is not racist and it's a shame that so little respect is given to a legitimate issue that's been raised, which is loyalty of citizens so that they don't help Hezbollah (Bashara) or justify Hamas' violence (as long as it's against Israeli civilians and not against Arabs).

Dear Honest Reporting;

It is barely the morning after and world press is scrambling to be first to the plate to weave the new spin that because Israel had a fair election and voted for Likud in a major way, all hopes for peace are now dashed and that the blame for same can be laid squarely on Israel, as if to insinuate that the choice for peace lies only with Israel and not with its enemies who yearn to kill every Jew....

See:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20090211/wl_time/08599187870600

HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin