« Key Periods in Israeli History |
Main
| Dirty Hari »
The BBC's Birthday Present to Israel
Jeremy Bowen's documentary is full of omissions and historical revisionism. See HonestReporting's latest communique: The BBC's Birthday Present to Israel
Posted at
07:19 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5874/28851616
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The BBC's Birthday Present to Israel:
What do you expect from the BBC, fair reporting on the Middle East. It is a public body staffed by the We are all Hisbollah Now leftie do-gooders. Jeremy Bowen has NEVER reported fairly on the situation and is probably actively supported by the production team!
Posted by: Anthony Garland at May 7, 2008 8:16:48 PM
Jeremy Bowen should spell his name as
Joseph Goebbels.
Posted by: Arthur Palgon at May 7, 2008 8:41:21 PM
Bowen's program continues his own and the world's anti-Jew spin on the situation in the Middle East.
The Palestinians have way less history in the region and yet they are held up as the rightful "owners" of the land that is the home of Jewish State.
Bowen was a very poor selection to host this "documentary" AND his placement is indicative of the BBC becoming the European equivalent of FOX News!
It is all appauling. I am surprised Bowen did not try to deny the Holocaust itself! That's usual direction the spin heads.
I am an American Jew and I feel that much of Europe has turned its back on Israel. Considering the victims of the Holocaust were killed on their land/their watch it makes it even harder to fathom.
Jeremy Bowen: You are not a true journalist. Maybe you are more of a novelist! You are an enemy of the Jewish people.
Posted by: Fred Schnitzer at May 7, 2008 8:44:32 PM
An excellent 'fisking' of Bowen's documentary. It is a shame that he will get away with his omissions and distortions as he has in the past - simply because the Beeb is untouchable in its lofty arrogance and the complaints procedure is woefully inadequate.
Posted by: Lyn at May 7, 2008 8:49:26 PM
Well its time to sue the BBC, and to uncover who is in control of this network, could it be that some Arabs have their way with what is produced on the BBC. Maybe the government needs to be investigated to find out who is being influenced by in Arabs in an illegal manner!
Posted by: Fedrucj at May 7, 2008 8:57:12 PM
Perhaps Honest Reporting members will not be surprised that thirteen people of my acquaintance had to be asked before one of them came even close to knowing either the world population of Jews today or the overall percentage (50% )of the Jewish population annihilated during the holocaust. While this may seem incidental to your efforts, I believe the numbers could be used positively to affect the perspective of many people who are not hostile but who sit indifferently on the fence on the Israeli question. Thanks. JM
Posted by: Joseph Mitlof at May 7, 2008 9:01:48 PM
You expected maybe HONESTY from the BBC, the product of unwed canine mothers?
(I think I cleaned that up pretty well)
Here in the good old USA, most of the people with whom I converse with concerning Israel are a thousand percent PRO-Israel and view disgusting and repulsive "reports" as just that, disgusting and revolting.
Each individual that had a part in that lying production should be sued by the State of Israel for slander. Only when those people begin to feel it in their pockets will that kind of tripe come to a screeching hald.
I fault ISRAEL AND EVERY OTHER ENTITY THAT REFERS TO THOSE ARABS AS PALESTINIANS!
They are ARABS...get it? They are NOT Palestinians, never were, never will be no matter what they call themselves.
Arafat was a blasted EGYPTIAN! Most of the Arabs who call themselves what they do were from Syria, Jordan, Egypt and other parts of the Arab world.
Any so-called "reporter" who pukes out screed should be stripped of their credentials and be banned from the State. Why is that not happening?
The Arabs are wonderful in one respect ONLY...lying. Their religious books tell them that lying is not only permissible, but it is a saintly thing to do whenever possible.
lying formed the basis of their PR campaigns while Israel just sat back on their high and mighty rear ends and did nothing to counter it. Repeat THEY DID NOTHING TO COUNTER THE SCREED THAT WAS TOSSED IN THEIR FACES AND NOW THEY ARE REAPING THE REWARD FOR THINKING THAT BY KEEPING THEIR YAPS SHUT THEY WOULD WIN THE UPPER HAND.
Angry? Me? You bet your booty I'm angry. My blood pressure just went from 120/60 to 190/78, too high for a post-stroke patient.
But MY getting angry won't do a blasted thing except let me blow off some steam here. ISRAEL has got to learn to scream louder and longer and with PROOF of what is happening: And they've got to get rid of the offspring of unwed mothers.
Posted by: Beverly Kurtin at May 7, 2008 9:06:19 PM
If the Jeremy Bowen documentary has been shown on British TV, certainly somebody must have recorded it? I must see it before I can submit a criticism to the BBC complaint section.
Does anybody know where it can be seen?..........David Most
Posted by: DAVID MOST at May 7, 2008 9:10:37 PM
ve have the FCC and could possibly obtain equal time to dispute these falsehoods and possibly obtain a judgement for libel. The Hon. Mr Gillerma should present this to the UN which is busily engaged being a propaganda outlt for Ior Israel^s enemies. Lets point out home times Jerusalem Apeears in our Bible as opposed to the Koran. Our job is to act and not React, Kol Tov
Posted by: Milton Adler at May 7, 2008 9:20:11 PM
This article should be reprinted in major newspapers around the world!
Posted by: Gerald Smith at May 7, 2008 9:30:13 PM
I saw Bowen's report on Israel's 60th independence day. Mr. Bowen is very reluctant to consider facts that are inconvenient for him (the ultimate intellectual dishonesty).
The facts that he ignores are: 1)Regarding Jerusalem, it became a "holy" city for Christians and Moslems ONLY BECAUSE IT had been THE CAPITAL and religious center OF ISRASEL AND JUDEA. IT BECAME OUR CAPITAL OVER 1000 YEARS BEFORE THE EMERGENCE OF CHRISTIANITY WHICH WAS PRESUMABLY INITIATED BY JEWISH SEPARATISTS. Jerusalem preceded the Arab conquest of Palestine by over 1600 years. It became important to the Moslems only because it had been the first center of monotheism and a religion whose essentials were adopted by Islam. And there has been a continuous Jewish community in Israel throughout the 2000 years following the defeat to the Romans in 70AD. You can easily verify this fact.
2)We accepted in 1948 the partition of Palestine as decided by the UN. This partition WAS NOT accepted by the Arabs who lived there (and did not consider themselves a separate entity from Syria and Jordan). Instead they tried to annihilate us with the help of the armies of the Arab states. By the way, the British mandate was very pro-Arab abd actually supported the Palestinian attempts to defeat us. The Palestinians and their Arab allies were repulsed in 1948-9 to the chagrin of the british and the Arabs. The ensuing 60 years have thus seen a constant attemts by the Arabs to defeat us without success. But to say that we are the aggressors is a lie and a transparently biased opinion of Bowen and the BBC.
I suggest that you stop for a moment and review all the facts before you continue this incredibly dishonest campaign agaisnt Israel. Or at least do not hide behind a righteous facade and assert your bias openly. It will do you a lot of good. Your anti-Israel campaign encourages radical elements that even bomb the trains in London. Or is there perhaps Saudi or Gulf money behind your ion of hate mongering against Israel?
We can assure you that we will celebrate the 100th anniversery despite the attempts of the BBC to harm us.
Posted by: David Gershon at May 7, 2008 9:42:04 PM
as a non-jewish dutch woman I combat Ilan Pappé, a lier about history, the inventer of etnic cleansing bij Israel. Bowen is influenced by him, I suppose, for Pappé promotes this sort of boycots against Israel. Perhaps the BBC needs money and is payed as a traitor? If not then the BBC retires from this kind of stuff immediately.
Posted by: van der spek at May 7, 2008 10:00:45 PM
Bowen's claim that Haganah's "Plan D", concluded during the British Mandate had anything to do with "ethnic cleansing" is but a malicious lie. I participated in it, scouting the village of Saffouria in the Galilee (the Jewish fortress that, according to Josephus Flavius, stood in Rome's way 2,000 years ago) There were plans for all levels of Arab threat. Plan D was the worst case scenario, where a contiguous territorial enclave was to be held in order to survive. No one ever anticipated this to happen during the British Mandate but it did, starting November, 30, 1947, the day after the UN passed the Palestine partition resolution. As a member of the Palmach I participated, since December, 1, 1947, in convoy running between Jerusalem and the coast, passing through a string of Arab villages whose armed militias did, in the end, close the noose around Jerusalem's 100,000 Jews, denying them water, food and means to defend themselves.
How would Bowen relieve Jerusalem's Jews without holding the strip along the Jaffa-Tel Aviv road after almost six months of siege ?
Familiar with the British Mandatory policy's "zig-zags", I do believe that war could have been averted, were Britain to stick to the word and spirit of its own Balfour Declaration of November, 2, 1917, that became, in 1922,the Mandate bestowed upon it by the League of Nations.
Would Bowen describe the WWII allied bombing of German cities "ethnic cleansing" ?
Posted by: Yoash Tsiddon-Chatto at May 7, 2008 10:06:35 PM
Maybe instead of explaining ourselves to these modern nazis who would like nothing better than to klll the mainder of the Jews, we should "go on the offensive" and drag them through every court in Great Britain and elsewhere. Keep them so busy that they would not have time to vent their hatred of Jews. Great Britain should look inside itself. the Empire is slowly but surely sinking into oblivion. Wait till Sharia Law takes them over.Who's going to have time to diss the Jews??
Posted by: Martin Lackner at May 7, 2008 10:15:44 PM
Shall we in the US write to BBC using your disection and observations?
Will it help or do we wait until it is shown here?
Posted by: Ronnie Pleet at May 7, 2008 10:19:33 PM
As a Brit who loves Israel I just want to apologise for the BBCs constant bias against Israel. This has been going on for a long while now and is becoming more blatant.
Please don't think all Brits think or speak this way. There are many who care a great deal for Israel and her people.
Posted by: Ali Waite at May 7, 2008 10:31:33 PM
You are really sick people. First, you occupy some one else's land, drive its inhabitants away, kill them, plunder their wealth, make them pay for no fault of theirs; then you call your airstrikes and bombings as defence and their faltered rocket attacks as terrorism. If you quote history to claim a right over this land, then you should know that you would be driven out once again, as has been the norm throughout history. You are the chosen people, not for anything good, but because you are the chosen tyrrants that history has never come across.
Posted by: abdul aziz khattak at May 7, 2008 10:39:40 PM
The summary didn't mention (so I assume the program didn't mention) that the mandate was given to Britain to form a Jewish homeland. Britain then gave more than 80 percent of it to the arabs, forming Jordan.
Posted by: chava at May 7, 2008 10:40:18 PM
It is interesting that you should quote Benny Morris when attacking Jeremy Bowen's report (which, to my shame I missed).
In his book "Rightous Victims" Benny Morris describes the Massacre of Deir Yasin just as what it was, a massacre of innocent civilians. Let my cite (page 208 in the Vintage edition of his book): "Whole families - were riddled with bullets and grenade fragments and buried when houses were blown up on top of them, men, women and children were mown downs as they emerged from houses, individuals were taken aside and shot...". Indeed there was fighting in Deir Yasin, but there was also slaughter of innocents. In his book Benny Morris mentions several other occasions were innocent Arab civilians were massacred,
It is also rather risky to cite Benny Morris as a witness to the fact that there was no plan to evict the Palestinians from their homes. Morris actually states that there was no general plan, but that there were many occasions where the eviction of Palestinians were planned; as late as 1951 (Ashkelon) and even 1967 (the Latrun area settlements).
Honest Reporting is known as a propaganda tool of the Likud, and your description of the events is certainly distorted as well,
Posted by: Gil Stamberger at May 7, 2008 10:43:00 PM
You all forget that billions of Muslim Arab $ are at work in GB and the BBC has a propaganda role to play to keep this money coming to GB.
Posted by: steven L at May 7, 2008 10:44:16 PM
It sounds like Jimmy Carter wrote the story with the usual slant and blame game. It is too bad that the BBC allows itself to be used or does the story follow BBC policy; I suspect that latter. Abba Eban said: the Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss and opportunity and they have done so over and over in the last 60 years.
Posted by: Mike Kurtzig at May 7, 2008 10:48:52 PM
At 9AM in Raleigh, NC, the local NPR station broadcasts BBC news with its frequent anti-Israel bias. How disheartening for our own NPR to air this!
Posted by: at May 7, 2008 10:54:16 PM
The BBC lost all credibility on any issue involving an Islamic exponent many years ago. As far as the BBC is concerned it is far more important to understand the motives of an Islamic terrorist than report their attrocities.
Posted by: Matthew Shostak at May 7, 2008 10:59:16 PM
Mr. Bowen, all I can say is you have a lot of hate pent up inside of you. If you have been mistreated by an Israeli please show some mercy. It's the arabs that do not want peace. They are vindictive and extremely jealous. It's a shame no one criticizes their leaders as the real culprits. It easy to cast blame but hard to forgive. Thank you, Richard
Posted by: richard mallin at May 7, 2008 10:59:56 PM
Bowen also forgets that the Jews were expelled from England in 1290. Who knows how many of those Jews ended up in what is today Israel.
Miles Pinedo, Tulsa, OK
Posted by: Miles Pinedo at May 7, 2008 11:00:00 PM
The BBC had a nasty little interview on their US radio station this morning too, with an Israeli Arab who doesn't think Israel is providing him with equal rights.
Posted by: Rose Landowne at May 7, 2008 11:02:07 PM
The BBc follows a long legacy of selective memory and selective reporting. Not all the world is aware that the British were those who blockaded the shores of israel, turning away ships loaded with holocaust survivors to new camps in Cyprus. So the legacy of pro-Arabism is alive and well in Eurabia... Unfortunately, Britain is up for a rude awakening when they will realize in whose hands they are playing.
I. Daskal M.D
Posted by: Ierachmiel Daskal at May 7, 2008 11:30:54 PM
I believe Israel made a PR blunder by not stating that this their 60th year instead of proclaiming that this is 3000 plus 60 of Israel birthday. Many people world-wide think that the Jews dropped into Palestine and took it from the Arabs.By proclaiming 3000 plus 60 over and over it will sink in and will counter the bias against Israel over time. It will not hurt to proclaim 3000 plus 60.
Posted by: Melvin Lavin at May 7, 2008 11:54:57 PM
I WISH TO COMMAND HONEST REPORTING FOR THEIR EXCELLENT EFFORTS ON OUR BEHALF. THIS ILLUSTRATES THAT IT IS NOT OUR SIXTIETH BIRTHDAY THAT WE CELEBRATE/BUT OUR 4060TH/AND I HOPE 'BH' MANY MORE
Posted by: bernard schanzer at May 8, 2008 12:10:57 AM
Perfectly balanced? No. But I can't help but feel your article is far more unbalanced than the programme itself. 'Honest' reporting? - yes I think it was. OK, Jeremy Bowen did betray the fact that his sympathies were not always with the Israelis from time to time,but it was not in any way as unbalanced as you suggest. Certainly not Israeli propaganda, but a dispassionate viewing would not see it as Palestinian propaganda either.
Posted by: Gerald Halon at May 8, 2008 12:37:38 AM
This is nothing less than a PLO tract paid for by the citizens of England. It is amazing that in our age of sensitivity to blatant discriminatory reporting, the trash that Bowen conjures up can be produced by the State owned BBC! What next, a BBC production of the Protocol of the Elders of Zion? This is pure anti-Israel propaganda that hizbollah's al-manar could proudly show on their television. And as the history of the region pre-dating Israel's re-birth is simply made up by Bowen, it is anti-Semitic as well. Scholars who are even mildly anti-Jewish should be shocked by his turning history upside down! Perhaps Bowen's next assignment will be to 'prove' that there was no Temple on the Mount and Judaism is a false religion. After all, that is what his PLO comrades postulate and it seems he takes his 'facts' straight out of PA history books- also paid for by the EU I might add. Bowen proves that if Germany beat England in 1940, there would be many Brits quite willing to point out Jews to their new masters.
Posted by: rick at May 8, 2008 12:46:55 AM
I'm disgusted. I think if I said what I'd really like to say and what everybody else is thinking, I'd be arrested. Dishonest, arrogant and egotistical don't even come close to what Jerem Bowen is.
Posted by: Tamar Ben-Dayan at May 8, 2008 12:52:24 AM
I think I vomited in my mouth a little when I read this article. I have come to the terrible conclusion that no matter what people will falsify Israel and the Jews. There are some nasty people out there who spew garbage such as this Bowen character and although I will not be able to stop them all on my own I am glas honest reporting has created a platform where we can all ban together to hopefully have a more powerful influence. I believe any person that supports the Pals. next door are just mad like they are since nobody else wants them in thier contry either but they are not going to bomb there own muslim brothers. Israel is our land since the time of Adam and Eve. Come on people even Jesus was a Jew and there are deniers out there who want to say we are immigrants to the land. I guess they have been asleep for a long time... damn those dinosaurs!
We know the truth! Our blood runs through to the core of the Earth on Israels soil. We will prevail. Isreal is out home, our heart and there is no option to fail!
Posted by: Sarah S. at May 8, 2008 12:57:09 AM
I am appalled at the biased reporting of Jeremy Bowen of the BBC. As Canadian Christians and evangelical and pentecostal, we are not Jewish, but very definitely do we pray for and support the claims of the people of Israel to the land that was taken from them in the dispersion.
That Mr. Bowen should misrepresent the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which was never fully implemented by the British government, is nothing short of astonishing.
The succeeding governments of Great Britain will much to answer for in their reneging of their early promise of land to the dispersed people of Israel.
In Canada, our own government has to answer for their turning away of the St. Louis ship during the Second World War, sending many Jews to death in the Holocaust.
I do hope that someone will be able to talk some sense into Mr. Bowen so that he gives at least a balanced coverage of the present crisis in the Middle East.
He should read and study an excellent book by Joan Peters entitled "From Time Immemorial". It examines the origins fo the Arab-Jewish Conflict Over Palestine. It was published by Harper & Row in 1984.
Philip Johnson
Canada
Posted by: Philip Johnson at May 8, 2008 2:06:32 AM
I am outraged with Jeremy Bowen's falsehoods about Israel. Why did the BBC allow him to make this documentary- I have concluded that the BBC is biased, & must have Arab backing- I will no longer watch anything BBC airs on TV.
Posted by: Rose Glasser at May 8, 2008 2:19:48 AM
Honest Reporting certainly makes telling arguments against the BBC's "reporting." But alas, if one reads the Letters to Editor in the current issue of The International Jerusalem Post, a number of correspondents make the point that there are very confused (self hating?) prominent UK Jews (including a Kaufman MP and the Chief Rabbi) who are either providing grist for the BBC mill, or alternatively,swallowing the lies and
expounding them. A Shande!
Posted by: milton mitzner at May 8, 2008 3:06:31 AM
So what's new? When are the English returning Scotland and Wales to the Scots and Welsh? Getting them out of Ireland and India was a bloody mess. Such tedious, boring people. No matter what happens, the Jews are the villains, but Englishmen walk on water.
Posted by: Sylvia Navon at May 8, 2008 3:37:36 AM
Disappointed with this article simply because it's reference points are vague and need to be explained in more detail. The details used to explain Jeremy Bowen's article seem clearer then the ones used to refute his point of view.
I am a strong supporter of Honest Reporting, but I really think this e-mail article missed the mark. Not to me or any Honest Reporting subscribers, but to all the other people I would have forwarded this article to had it not been so filled with vague refutations instead of specific ones.
We "subscribers" are the "choir" that you can preach to, but there are too many others that simply wouldn't be able to connect the dotted lines that refute Mr. Bowen's article.
Happy 60th Anniversary Israel!!!
Posted by: Brian Budin at May 8, 2008 4:10:26 AM
The reason Europe turned its back on Israel is simply to clean it's concious. And if Europestan think that the more they will suck up to the Arabs the better off they will be, I have news for them: the more you try to upease them, the more they think you are weak, and the more they will demand of you.
Half truth is worse than a lie. Bolden shot himself in his foot: a one sided documentary is always perceived as propaganda. Anybody with the right mind will see through it.
Posted by: Rachel Yane at May 8, 2008 4:55:50 AM
Israel needs no friends but One. The BBC seems intent on not being One's friend.My prayer is for the well being of Israel.
Posted by: Eric Drexil Holland at May 8, 2008 6:52:54 AM
Mr Bowen, You forgot to say something about Israel's national anthem - or might that have been too much to bear?
“As long as deep in the heart
The soul of a Jew yearns,
And towards the East
An eye looks to Zion
Our hope is not yet lost
The hope of two thousand years,
To be a free people in our land
The land of Zion and Jerusalem”
Posted by: Lenny Kristal at May 8, 2008 8:48:23 AM
It is not new for me that Mr. Jeremy Bowen does not or does not want to understand the israeli palestinian conflict.
A few years ago at Ben Gurion airport I met him when flying from Tel Aviv to London.I asked him if after his visit he understood better the conflict, he answered that he didn't .SHAME for the BBC that keep people who do not understand on what they are talking about.
ALSO NOT NEW FOR THE BBC
Posted by: leonardo siplovich at May 8, 2008 9:03:42 AM
BBC represents the voice of UK as VOA does the voice of America. Britain has forgotten the lesson of its traitorous treatment of Israel in the events leading up to 1917,a crime and a sin which has seen PAX BRITANNICA "the empire on which the sun never set" meeting its fate as a nation plunging into the dying embers of a setting sun. Not only that, USA as an extension of the former British Empire, is also fast fading into its own sunset because of Bush's persistence for Israel to give up its land for a Palestinian State. Why can't the oil-rich Arab states absorb the Palestinians, with all the talk of Islamic brotherhood and solidarity?
Posted by: Andrei Lo at May 8, 2008 9:47:31 AM
Whilst deploring the Jeremy Bowen/BBC documentary I have not heard or read any denial of the supposed massacre in a mosque perpetrated by Jews-any truth or information on this would be welcomed. I am not condonning this incident if true but it in war regtable incidents happen even today.
Posted by: Graham Stone at May 8, 2008 11:18:07 AM
Why has not the Balen report been published?Supposed to be an impartial review of the BBC handling of M.E. politics.
It has not seen the light of day! I wonder why?
Posted by: Samuel barsam at May 8, 2008 1:10:02 PM
Having read all the comments - many of them very hateful to my surprise - I'm left somehow dumbfounded. How is it possible to be so dis-informed in today's age of information? What the readers/subsribers of (dis-)honest reporting are spreading, is nothing else but outdated zionist propaganda from the 80's. I recommend strongly, to read as a starter:
"The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict, THIRD EDITION (including Intifada 2000), PUBLISHED BY JEWS FOR JUSTICE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
The conflict could have been easily avoided, if the Zionist Enterprise of Herzl and the world at large would have followed the countless petitions which were brought forward at the Damascus Conference of 1919. Petitions by Christian, Jewish and Muslim residents alike to turn Palestine into a State (similar to a Commonwealth) for ALL inhabitants. With bi-lingual education for ALL. With one common past and future history for ALL. Void of attrocities committed against each other. Read the King Crane Commission Report incl. Annex. But the Zionist Enterprise didn't want to listen.
Read what Asher Ginsberg (Ahad Ha'am) had to say in 1889 (!) in "The Wrong Way" and how he warned of the dire consequences if one would steal the land from the residents. He is just one of the countless warners throughout history up until today. But the ZE wouldn't listen.
Read what our revered Martin Buber said time and again. But it fell on deaf ears.
Why do we ommit from our memory, that we did not follow the UN Charta and we did not respect the Balfour Declaration?
Why do we ommit from our history, that the Arabs offered a comprehensive total peace at the Lausanne Conference in 1949? A peace offer which failed because of Israel's "intransigence" - original text, see also protocol of the conference and UN-Archiv.
What was the fate of the countless peace offers? The King Fahd Plan 1980? The offers of 1982 – the Fez Plan; Reagan Plan; Brezhnev Plan? The Shultz Peace Plan 1988? Madrid and Oslo I 1994? Oslo II 1995? Wye-River Memorandum in 1998? Tenet Offer 1998? Mitchell Report which Israel vehemently refysed? Sharm El Sheikh Agreement 1999? Camp David II Summit 2000? Taba 2001? The Roadmap 2002? The offer of the Beirut Conference - the Saudi Peace Initiative 2002? The Geneva Accord?
Israel signs after long discussions and changes - and before the ink is dry on the paper it breaches what it just signed. The settlements pop up like mushrooms after the rain, the targetted killing continues with fresh fervor, the annexation advances ...
What about the many ceasefires, which the Palaestinians - incl. Hamas - adhered to while they were daily bombarded and the targetted killings went on unabatted? The last one lastet for 17 months while Israel continued its murderous policy.
Why do we cancel from our memories, that "Occupation is the disease, violence is the symptom". Have we forgotten, what our forefathers tought us?
Read the Fateful Triangle by Noam Chomsky - yes, you must call him a self-hating Jew, I know. Read John Quigley, "Palestine and Israel: A
Challenge to Justice.".
But first and foremost read Ha Sepher Ha Palmach, The Book of Palmach. “The History of the Palmach” which in part has been published in the 50ies and in its entirety in 1972 (see: Kibbutz Menchad Archive, Palmach Archive, Efal, Israel). This is the history of the predecessor of the IDF and lists all our attrocities before and after the creation of Israel:
Operation Nachson, 1 April 1948; Operation Harel, 15 April 1948; Operation Misparayim, 21 April 1948; Operation Chametz, 27 April 1948; Operation Jevuss, 27 April 1948; Operation Yiftach, 28 April 1948; Operation Matateh, 3 May 1948; Operation Maccabi, 7 May 1948; Operation Gideon, 11 May 1948; Operation Barak, 12 May 1948; Operation Ben Ami, 14 May 1948; Operation Pitchfork, 14 May 1948; Operation Schfifon, 14 May 1948 and many more.
You find names and names of towns and villages, destroyed and its people murdered or expelled by us:
Qazaza (21 Dec. 1947), Sa'sa (16 Feb. 1948), Haifa (21 Feb. 1948), Salameh (1 March 1948), Biyar Adas (6 March 1948), Qana (13 March 1948), Qastal (4 April 1948), Deir Yassin (9 April 1948), Lajjun (15 April 1948), Saris (17 April 1948), Tiberias (20 April 1948), Haifa (22 April 1948), Jerusalem (25 April 1948), Jaffa (26 April 1948), Acre (27 April 1948), Jerusalem (1 May 1948), Safad (7 May 1948), Beisan (9 May 1948), Akko (14 May 1948).
Go to the UN-Archiv, War Documents, Middle East Section, and have a look at the maps of the region. Are the maps too self-hating Jews? Anti-Semitic? Look at the maps of PASSIA which too are illustrating the history of the past and the present.
Why do you lack any mention or link to any of the peace groups? Read Gush Shalom, Jews Not Zionists, Not in my Name, Neturei Karta, Righteous Jews, Jews for Justice in the Middle East, The Other Israel, Rabbi for Human Rights, ACRI, ICAHD, etc. etc. All self-hating Jews so they fit the pre-disposed and programmed mind?
Read "THE KEY TO PEACE: DISMANTLING THE MATRIX OF CONTROL" by Jeff Halper, http://www.icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?menu=6&submenu=3.
The only just solution is: Get out of the occupied land, demolish all settlements, declare finally after 60 years the borders of Israel and accept to be a state among the states and adhere to the rules of the International Community of which we want so desperately be a part of.
And most important: practice what we demand for ourselves; acknowledge the right of the Palestinian people to exist in the land of their forefathers. In peace. Without having to fear on daily basis the attrocities and agression of Israel.
This would be a befitting birthday gesture of a democratic (real) State of Israel.
I realise that my comment will propably not pass the censorship. So be it.
Nonetheless I wish all of you Shalom, Peace and Salam.
PS And my compliments to BBC that they do not give in to threats. In today's world this is a rarety.
Posted by: Eleonora at May 8, 2008 2:42:41 PM
I am horrified by Jeremy Bowen. What sort of hnuman being is he?
Posted by: Pam Michelson at May 8, 2008 5:38:41 PM
I believe the problem of bias exists because these so called commentators are ignorant or Spiritually blind to the truth. This is why Jeremy Bowen can only look at it from the worlds prejudiced view point. All you need to do is look in the Bible and you will find the truth as spelled out by the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and all will be revealed. The land belongs fair and square to Israel as an everlastinrg covenant between the Almighty God and His people Israel. What is more King David actually paid money for this land to further reinforce Israel's right to be the legitimate owners of all the land of Israel and much more besides. Through these Spiritual eyes Israel is not 'occupying' any of the land, it already belongs to them.
Can you imagine the picture the other way round with the Jews in Mecca having conquered that land, everybody would say it should be in Muslim hands as it is their Spiritual home. People should take the same view with Israel. Whist their has been no covenent between the muslims and mecca and God, Israel have the legitimate paid up right in all aspects to live in the land of their inheritance, ie their God given right. Strengthened by King David's payment for this land.
Posted by: maureen Davies at May 8, 2008 5:47:15 PM
Jeremy Bowen is just another liar and jew hater. I'm sure he would have fit right in with Hitler and the SS. They are probably his heros. What does he get out of lying? I guess it helps feed his hatred.
Posted by: Kay Sheil at May 8, 2008 6:06:26 PM
Lovers of Israel-
Its about time for you to wake up and small the felafel and techina!
You can spend a lifetime talking about all the legal facts in opposition to Bowen and anti-semetic friends, but until Israel and major Jewish orgs finally learn how to play the HASBARAH game which Israel, American Jewish orgs and now Jewish Brits have consisitently failed.
Be there first with your own factual, creative and impacting posters, exhibits, radio and TV spot ads, print ads that dont look like a legal brief, outdoor billboards and grass roots media- educating neighborhood churches, we will continue to remain highly frustrated with slanted reporting, but this will always continue so fight back as we really have not done- with creative impacting P.R. that will win over the millions of well meaning yet ignorantamericans and others who just dont know. We always preach to the choir but never really educate all the millions who could be potential supporters outside evangelicals.
You need to beat them at their own game and not by sitting and rehashing land, partitians, attacks etc, but Americans will be highly impressed with all of Israel credits and accomplishments in science, health, agriculture, technology etc. see Website Israel 21C and find creative ways to sell this important and impressive information. I dont care to open a secular newspaper and see an insert by Saudi Arabia about it accomplishments, when I could see an insert by Israel, which has been only in Jewish papers- big deal!
All you Israel loving organizations, stop being bureaucrats protecting your org turf and learen how to use media, not buy simply catching all the lies, but getting out there and doing your own media blitz that for some stupid reason Israel has yet to do.
Posted by: Avrum Ashery at May 8, 2008 7:37:20 PM
All previous comments seem to have said it all. Jeremy Bowen is a sad member of humanity. What is the BBC waiting for to throw him out on his "tuchus"?
Posted by: Ralph Goodridge at May 8, 2008 7:42:01 PM
I don't like the title which says "Israel's 60 birthday". This is to please the enemies of Israel. Israel was born many,many years ago before even some countries got their names. This 60 years celebration is the re-birth of Israel or Independence day.
Posted by: Kill_terrorist at May 8, 2008 7:48:44 PM
Jeremy Bowen envies the success of USA and displays his wapped hatred through bashing Israel because US supports Israel in the war of survival. George Onah, Nigeria
Posted by: at May 8, 2008 8:05:01 PM
Jeremy Bowen belongs to the old order of jews haters and he probably wants some oil bloc from a sheik in the middle east. He must be a German of hitler days and not British proper. He is certainly a disappointment as a journalist because he is onesided in his analysis and his comments are thoroughly and bare-faced anti-Israel
Posted by: george onah at May 8, 2008 8:11:16 PM
Would some-one please buy Jeremy Owen a Modern Bible!! & get him to read it - if possible.
Posted by: Mrs. Sylvia L. Morgan at May 8, 2008 8:55:34 PM
Jeremy Bowen has decided to recreate history so future generations as well as future generations can point to his distortion of fact and use it as truth when in fact his production is most likely 10% truth and 90% from his warped opinion of Israel and Jews in particular.
Posted by: Allen Price at May 8, 2008 9:02:49 PM
The BBC is getting more tiresome. Yes, they are anti-Semitic, why not,the British government has been and still is.You would think after the bombings of the buses, etc. they would see it as a wake-up call but no, the British left is still swooning over Arab money & oil and their old scapegoat, the Jews. I don't think that Scotland Yard is looking at their moslem population with such rose colored glasses but they have to deal with them directly unlike the so- called intellectuals. You can always distort history if you hate someone, you just tailor the "facts" to your disgusting point of view.There is no point going over point by point the lies Bowen uses, WE KNOW the truth.
Posted by: GILDA ROTHENBERG at May 8, 2008 10:45:14 PM
This is a thoughtful, much needed comeback to Bowen’s documentary, filling in important historical information. It is a shame that he has so distorted the situation, especially on a program meant to commemorate Israel’s 60th birthday. Thank you to Honest Reporting, for giving a more integrated, informed view of the issue.
Posted by: Richard Horowitz at May 8, 2008 11:44:42 PM
I suppose I am not in the least surprised that the BBC would post more biased articles about Israel. I suggest to Mr. Jeremy Bowen to " Don't quit your day job" Get your facts straight and educate yourself about Israel instead of your childish ramblings you are posting!
Thank you, Betti Miner
Posted by: Mrs. Betti Miner at May 9, 2008 12:37:55 AM
In Tasmania last night on BBC World Katya Adler and the BBC Jerusalem correpondent slammed the state of Israel in their reporting of Israels 60th birthday celebrations. I wrote the following letter to the BBC
Katya Adler reports on Israel's 60th birthday celebration. Whilst grudgingly admitting the huge advances and contributions that Israel has made in the sciences, she spends almost the entire footage focussing on the Palestinians, how badly off they are, how deprived, how victimised. She failed to even mention the daily barrage of rocket attacks on Southern Israel. She is followed by the BBC correspondent in Jerusalem who spent his air time, supposedly reporting on the 60th Anniversary of Israel, by dwelling on all the negatives, the lack of security and making implications about the right of the Jewish state to exist. The newscaster in the studio spent his time on air highlighting the arab point of view, that the palestinians see the founding of Israel as a catastrophee and several times informing viewers that the BBC will be airing the arab( read BBC) point of view next week on this issue. No congratulations, no talk of all the successes, no mention of all the remarkable achievements from a desert to a modern industrial technological country in such a short time. Not one complimentary word. And you have the audacity to even consider this as balanced. Bigoted reporting when it comes to Israel is what I have come to anticipate from the BBC and am never disappointed.
The BBC is a disgrace and somehow is immune to any criticism. Clearly there are some very important islamists calling the shots there. Perhaps that is where Ken Livingstone will apply for his next job, he would be in good company!
Glenda
Posted by: Glenda Fawbert at May 9, 2008 9:44:20 AM
BBC/Bowen's "Birthday Present to Israel" is so much unsubstantiated hot air questioning not only BBC's integrity but also its competence.
For the sake of brevity I shall refer to Haganah's "Plan D"during the British Mandate, allegedly aimed at the "ethnic cleansing" of the Arabs of Palestine. I participated in "Plan D", as one of a team scouting and planning the attack on the Arab Galilean village of Saffurieh (The fortified Jewish town of Tsippory that resisted the Romans 2,000 years earlier- according to Josephus Flavius eye witness writing)
We had contingency plans made to counter the terror and all out war threats, especially since the 1939 (Chamberlain "Peace") British "about face" on their mandatory commitment to the League of Nations re the establishment of a "Jewish National Home" in Palestine.
There were "A" and "B"and "C". "Plan D" concerned the worst case scenario,
when Arab local and foreign militias will threaten our very existence, a case that requested a contiguous territorial base to fight from. We never believed that this may happen during the British Mandate, but it did, on November, 30,1947, curtesy the British who left the crossing of Arab borders practically free while harnessing all their Navy's and much of their RAF might to prevent Jewish holocaust survivors from entering Palestine.
What plan would Bowen/ BBC devise, for instance, to prevent the promissed Arab massacre of the almost six months besieged 100,000 Jews of Jerusalem, with no water, food or ammunition, other than taking the villages along the road to the coast, etc.?
I participated in the earlier convoy running attempts that rendered massive supplies simply impossible.
To end, I have a natural empathy for the "Do Good" intelligentia's naivete, or wishful thinking in ivory towers. I wish only they could spend some time together with the Arab militias and armies, see their plans and witness their deeds.
To call "Plan D" a plan for "etnic cleansing" is to claim that Europe's invasion by the allies in 1944 was a genuine attempt at ethnic cleansing of Europe of the German race. Same with the RAF bombings of Germany.
May be that the BBC and Bowen think that this was the case.
Posted by: Yoash Tsiddon-Chatto at May 9, 2008 11:03:54 AM
This morning, Friday May 9, a BBC World News reporter was describing Hezbollah's challenge to the Lebanese government and the violence that is occuring in Beirut. In his identification of Hezbollah the reporter described them as having "defended Lebanon from Israeli incursion".
Furthermore - even leaving out the egregious nonsense above - the story was presented as, at most, a symmetrical conflict. The use of force and arms by one party to influence and intimidate the polity of a sovereign government is, to the BBC, a perfectly legitimate expression of power by one of the parties.
It is highly unlikely that the BBC's reporter has just arrived at his Lebanon post after a lengthy reporting assignment - out of communication with the world - in the Antarctic or perhaps on Saturn.
It is abundantly evident that BBC reporting - at least in regard to Israel - is propaganda and, in regard to Lebanon's moderate and secular politicians, indifferent.
BBC is providing "Hugo Chavez/Muammar Quadafy current events instruction" but hardly dispassionate "information".
BBC World News or Hezbollah's World Views !!!
Posted by: Reuven Savitz at May 9, 2008 8:55:41 PM
One always gets exactly what one expects from the BBC.
For how much longer must the citizens of the UK be compelled to pay a TV Licence Fee; a euphemism for the BBC's funding.
There can be no argument to continue supporting the public funding of this monster.
Posted by: Peter Lewin at May 10, 2008 1:29:06 AM
No ethnic cleansing by the Israeli forces? Bah, humbug.
How do you explain the fact that my now deceased Israeli brother-in-law, a member of the Haganah in 1947-48 and later a major in the IDF, proudly related to me how he
and other members of the Haganah/Palmach drove a peaceful village of Arabs from their homes in Palestine into Lebanon. He had no remorse when he described how the hapless residents fled leaving their shoes by the door and their pots on the stove.
What he did was repeated over and over again and this was before the Arab countries came to the assistance of their brothers. It is past time that we as Jews recognize that the Jewish state was built on the dispossession of another people who have an equal right to the land. And, please do not call me a "self-hating Jew" for telling the truth. It just won't work anymore just as calling people "anti-Semitic" for criticizing Israel just doesn't work anymore. Yes, there is real anti-Semitism out there but those who sling around that slur do more to create anti-Semitism than they realize.
Posted by: Jan at May 10, 2008 1:56:19 AM
It seems just a tad problematic to be urging people who haven't seen the film to send in complaints to the BBC.
More of the "nascent McCarthyism" that David Landua mentioned?
Posted by: Michael at May 10, 2008 5:18:02 PM
Few years back I had suggested the BBC to change their name to PPC - "Palestine Propaganda Corporation".
Few months back the BBC had apologized for calling Jerusalem 'Israel's capital city'. Since then, I lost interest in the BBC. I stopped watching BBC, both TV channels and website.
When we hook up to a cable TV operator, we may need to insist on a package that excludes BBC.
Posted by: Michael Pasternak at May 10, 2008 9:36:43 PM
The Arabs have long been used as pawns by their own when it comes to manipulation. The ugly truth is they themselves have allowed this to continue through fear of reprisals and ignorance, and go so far as to vote for the likes of the murderous Hamas to govern them. Mind you, when Arab Israel's were asked if they thought it a good idea to be ruled by the same Hamas, the majority opted for living under Israeli rule rather than subject themselves and their families to a life of want, fear and need. In the real world, you cannot run with the hare and hunt with the hound, but try and have an Arab agree with you on such logic. Will the day ever come when they love their children more than they hate Israel? Not in my lifetime. As for the BBC, this lot of state supported welfare bums and doubtful starters have sold their own country down the river with their constant barrage of political correctness against the people of the UK, so certainly we ought not be surprised to see them continue their double dealing when given a golden opportunity to present Israel as just another oppressive regime as though it were Zimbabwe they were speaking of. Of course, the BBC knows from one sided dictatorial rule: is this not what they present to the world through their shabby reporting just who they in fact are? Godspeed Israel.
Posted by: maura collins at May 11, 2008 4:45:32 PM
What do you expect from the BBC with their love of Palestinians and every opportunity to put Israel in a negative light? I live in the UK and watched the show for about 10 minutes before puking due to the inaccuracies and whitewashing of history. It is amazing that the BBC cannot comprehend that before Israel became a country that it was a terroritory of the British Empire nor do they accept that they proposed a two state solution prior to WWII? Where was that in Jeremy's reporting? By the way the BBC protrays Israel you think the country sprang out of existance in order to destroy Palestine when in fact it was a terroritory controlled by different countries at different times and in reality the Palestinians have brought much of their problems onto themselves by publicly vowing to destroy Israel before its creation. Once again why were these facts missed by Jeremy Bowen?
Posted by: Brian at May 11, 2008 5:06:33 PM
I used to watch BBC once. It was one of the prestigious media of the UK. Not any more, since Arabs, Pakistanis and Asians have taken over. Al-Jazeera and BBC makes no difference.
Posted by: Jane Harting at May 11, 2008 7:17:34 PM
Of all the people that could have made this programme it had to be Bowen!!! The man was kicked out of Israel by a Left wing government; thats how bad he is! They appear to have let him back in, but he is still a S.O.A.B. where Israel and Jews are concerned. The man clearly loves Arabs more than he loves the truth. He is a very poor journalist and should be got rid of.
Posted by: Fivish at May 11, 2008 9:33:21 PM
Why does a government monopoly taxpayer funded news media continue to spew such obviously biased and erronious drivel!!!
Posted by: douglas babcook at May 11, 2008 9:35:56 PM
The British are embarrassed by the BBC it is no longer british but run by muslims and sodomites. Bowen did know the History of the Temple but his Editors probably determine the take on mid East - as they are ignorant left wing atheists all we can do is apologise and suggest you look at sites where Brits do support and comprehend the reality of Israeli history and the Judaic roots of the Christian faith which mean we understand why we are called to Bless Ysrael and pray for the Peace of Jerusalem. Please accept our deepest apologies
Posted by: Mrs W at May 12, 2008 12:11:35 AM
And please, please remember that for months the BBC has been heavily pushing Obama. That should ring alarm bells everywhere.
Posted by: Maurice Jones at May 12, 2008 2:10:55 AM
abdul aziz khattak at May 7, 2008 10:39:40 PM
I am an Irishwoman, I am not Jewish, and can assure you I know a crooked Englishman’s words when I hear them. We have dealt with this species for centuries and if you think your enemies have made life difficult for you, you need to revisit that concept. You appear to have a reverse argument going on here, as Arabs have occupied land belonging to the Jewish people for centuries, rent free mind you, but now that Israeli’s have reclaimed it, legally I might add and turned it into a thriving modern country, you call them names? Please, your burnt offering of a letter condemning these people for taking back their property leads one to think that perhaps people are correct in their belief that all Arabs have been thoroughly brainwashes with this utter fantasy. By your logic, my own country Ireland ought not to have had the right to claim our country back, we should simply have allowed England to continue to use it as their very own personal playground while we sat by and our numbers dwindled through starvation and emigration? Today, decent English people who are trying to get away from crime infested England come to my country to work, and guess what? There are no hard feelings toward them, because they after all did not cause the problems we suffered for centuries, it was their rotten government who was our nemesis, not their citizens. No, you and your ilk cannot stand it that tiny little Israel has shown you up to the world for what you truly are, and the lot of you are eaten alive with jealousy.
Posted by: maura collins at May 12, 2008 3:37:50 AM
[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]
|