Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008
 

 
 
Media Backspin
« BBC Doesn't Deny HR Report Findings | Main | A Mideast Lesson For Greenway »

Tuesday, January 22 2008

AFP Bans Wiki, Facebook As Sources

Wikipedia and Facebook are useful for research, but relying on either as a "source" is risky. I hope other papers follow AFP's action.

(Hat tip: Micropersuasion)

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e200e5501fd8708833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AFP Bans Wiki, Facebook As Sources:



 

Comments

Wikipedia has a policy of neutrality that is meticulously enforced daily by thousands of editors. This is exactly why they are banning it, lest an unexperienced writer would mistakenly write a balanced article!

It may have a policy of neutrality but how well that is enforced depends on how well the editors of a specific article make sure ist in place.
In practice, many Wikipedia articles have mistakes and bias. Yes, they can rollback a page if it is changed inappropriately, but there is no guarentee that at any given time a specific page would be "bias free".
Thus, I agree. Great for research, lousy for sourcing. Reporters can and should use it as a jumping point but should make sure they know their stuff beyond that.



 

Post a comment

[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]






HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin