« Sacrifice Israel For Arab Coalition Against Iran |
Main
| Thoughts On Passover »
"To Be Sure"
Palestinian Finance Minister Salam Fayyad (pictured) got op-ed space in the LA Times. How does he write this with a straight face?
Because Hamas' political platform did not conform to key elements of the peace process, including Palestinian recognition of Israel's right to exist and a commitment to renounce violence, the international community imposed sanctions on the Palestinian Authority.
Although much of the discussion leading to the formation of the unity government has focused on these two commitments, their validity should not have been much in question. After all, these commitments were made by the Palestine Liberation Organization, the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, in a crystal-clear and binding agreement in 1993, and no Palestinian government has the authority to revoke them. In fact, the unity government's platform explicitly states that it will honor all PLO agreements, which, to be sure, include these two commitments.
"To be sure?" Fayad should know better.
1. A look at the PA unity government platform doesn't bear out Fayyad's claims. See here for details.
2. Abbas' primary task as required by the road map was to dismantle the infrastructure of terror. Instead, Abbas asked Hamas to form a government.
3. The PLO isn't the "sole representative" of the Palestinian people. The overwhelming number of Palestinians voted for Hamas -- which never joined the more secular PLO. Even during the pre-Oslo years, the Tunisia-based PLO nearly faded into obscurity while Israel dealt with local Palestinians on the ground.
4. Mahmoud Abbas’ legitimacy stems from his position as popularly elected President of the Palestinian Authority. He was only chosen as PLO chairman by cadres of the member organizations after Yasser Arafat died. The Palestinians need democracy, and they also need to live with the consequences of their choice of votes. The PA is the democratic and legitimate representative of the Palestinians, who have elected Hamas -- warts and all.
Posted at
10:37 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5874/17369982
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "To Be Sure":
Fayyad has a difficult job ahead of him in trying to instill financial accountability within the Palestinian Authority. One is correct to point out that the POV that he expresses is not that of the Palestinian government, however one could hope that it might be. According to Wikipedia (not always a good source, I'll grant you) he was considered for the job of Palestinian Prime Minister but Hamas rejected him, in part because one of his policy requirements was the recognition of Israel. Keep in mind that he is neither a member of Hamas or Fatah.
Fayyad may be taken as a positive sign that change is possible, though not as evidence that it has already occurred.
Posted by: L. King at Apr 1, 2007 7:59:19 AM
[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]
|