Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe to MyMSN
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
Media Backspin
« Shock to the system | Main | Protesting Poison Pens »

Wednesday, February 1 2006

What If They Were Hard-Liners?

ApAP reports that Hamas is fumbling for international legitimacy, but in the process, inadvertently grants the terror organization a little of it's own:

Despite the rhetoric and the violence, the group has shown a pragmatic willingness to compromise its ideology in the past.

With Palestinians weary of the devastating fighting with Israel that began in September 2000, Hamas' spiritual leader, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, came up with a new plan. Palestinians would accept a state in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem in exchange for a long-term truce with Israel.

The proposal was similar to the one Zahar described to CNN, though Yassin emphasized the truce would be only a stage leading to the eventual destruction of Israel, a detail Zahar did not mention.

So let's get this straight: If Israel will concede a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and eastern Jerusalem, Hamas will offer a long term truce which the group has previously admitted will eventually lead to the destruction of the Jewish state.

And AP calls this pragmatic?



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What If They Were Hard-Liners?:



HR Links

HR Social Media

Featured Blogs

Featured Links

Media Backspin