Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008
 

 
 
Media Backspin
« Three Points on Terror | Main | Today's bungled headline »

Sunday, March 13 2005

BBC's backpedaling apology

VanunuThe Guardian reports that the BBC apologized to Israel in writing for the way it handled coverage of Mordechai Vanunu (pictured). In exchange, correspondent Simon Wilson, who was the network’s Jerusalem bureau chief, will be allowed to return to Israel. After Vanunu was released from prison in 2004, Wilson interviewed the former nuclear technician, then refused to cooperate with Israeli censors, and smuggled tapes of his interview out of the country. Israel responded by refusing to extend Wilson’s work permit and banning him from entering the country.

The climbdown has angered some BBC journalists, who say it will compromise their work in Israel.

The agreement was to have remained confidential, but the BBC unintentionally posted details on its website before removing them a few hours later.

This is not the first time pressure forced the BBC to backpedal over Vanunu.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e200e5501fba6c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BBC's backpedaling apology:



 

Comments

I do not understand how it will compromise any of their work. What they do not understand, they do not investigate, what looks like good work on the part of Jews is made to look bad for Israel, and whenever someone dies, it is the Jew's fault.

Explain to me how they are in any way going to have to change their M.O.

How did they "unintentionally" post these details on their website?

"National security" censorship of course means removing anything that the more reactionary pro-Israelis don't want us to hear.

The BBC article of course conceals the results of the discussions that were held.

It is a sad comment on the self-censorship of the BBC that we now need to assume that all BBC news coming from Israel has been spun to make it as pro-Israel as possible. Blair and Hutton between them have thoroughly cowed the organisation.



 

Post a comment

[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]






HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin