 |
|
|
Thursday, November 25 2004Ending the IncitementThe latest HonestReporting communique, 'Ending the Incitement', has just been released. To receive HR communiques in your inbox, just sign up above. Please use the comments below for discussion of this communique.
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ending the Incitement: CommentsOT I won't be expecting too much from the "without conditions" statement. It's similar to how Assad's father first demanded "full withdrawal" as a basis for agreement, only to change his tack when he saw the Israelis were willing to do business - pocketing any concessions and using them as a point of departure rather than a point of conclusion. The initial talks between Rabin and Hafez Al-Assad were based on "full withdrawal" from the Golan Heights. As Rabin moved closer towards Assad, Assad stepped further away. Assad later defined "full withdrawal" to mean full withdrawal to the 1967 lines. To Rabin "full withdrawal" meant withdrawal to the international border, and not the June 1967 lines Backspin! Look at this article from the Jerusalem Post, shocking evidence about UNRWA's terrorist funding, were talking as bad as it gets! http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1101183314284&p=1006953079865 Rabbi Meir Kahane, was unfortunately right. Relocation of ALL Arabs from Israel to Jordan and Egypt is the ONLY solution to ALL intifadas, not any Road Maps and/or foreign solutions imposed on Israel as it has been from the Roman to the American and European empires. Now a massive surgical operation is neeeded to remove the terror root in the midst of Eretz Yisrael. A third Palestinian State would send a message to ALL terrorist organisations that violence pays. A relocation precedent has been set: Jewish refugees from many Muslim countries were absorbed by Israel, Russian and Ethiopian Jews are still immigrating to Israel. Jews from all over the world are welcome in Israel. The real fact is that the so-called "leaders of the Palestinian people" are trouble makers unwanted by any of their "Muslim brothers". Even in Jordan they tried to overthrow king Hussein and they were expelled instead of being executed in 1970. They then turned their weapons against Israel and begat the idea of another Palestinian state which would also support these bad apples. Again in 1982 the terrorists were caught in Beirut by the Israeli forces but international pressure freed them, this allowed them to promote the first Intifada in 1989, until today they are able to maintain the second, for the last four years with their new terror invention: Suicide bombers, killers of unarmed civilians in public places, an easy and convenient way to get rid of their personal enemies and/or young women who dishonor their families with premarital pregnancies. The entire Muslim Gaza population should be absorbed by Egypt; after all, the Egyptians received the Sinai penninsula and the oil fields back from Israel under their Peace Treaty. Thousands of acres where there is sufficient space to develop and build cities for their faster population growth. In Gaza today they are overcrowed as their brothers are in Ramallah, Jenin and Jericho. In Jordan the population density is around 75 per square mile, while in Israel is reaching 600. Nobody seems to think about this important factor: population explosion needs room to expand and only Jordan and Egypt have the land available. The human rights of Jews and Arabs of the Near East is at stake, ask for more information at am_israel@hotmail.com *Sigh* Now, thanx to this nut, ppl will say "ah.. this is a kahanist site". There is a more reasonable solution: Egypt, with an enormous amount of free land (in comparison to the other two parties), would contribute a larger area than the others. This would, in many ways, be a wonderful solution but Egypt is very unlikely to agree to any such act of good will, especially since the Palestinian leadership will hardly be in favour and Egypt would not like to be seen as going against the Palestinians. The Palestinians, for that matter, don't want a workable solution. They'd disagree just as they refuse to build (or have the UN construct) nice neighborhoods for those people living in awful refugee camps to move to. Finding 'a solution' (especially a nice one) is, as far as they're concerned, the biggest threat to their ultimate dream of destroying Israel and taking over everything.
now which nut are you talking about? This nut: "Israel would give some land to Egypt, Egypt will give some land to the Palestinians, the PA will give some -very small- piece of land to Israel." You know your history and you know your facts but obviously havent learnt anything Post a comment[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]
|
