Backspin FrontPage
Backspin FrontPage
HonestReporting.com
Media Backspin
About Media Backspin Contact Media Backspin Media Backspin
  Media Backspin
Backspin FrontPage
 
 
 
Media Backspin RSS Feed   [ About RSS ]
 
Subscribe with Bloglines
 
Add to My AOL
 
Subscribe in Bloglines
 
Subscribe to MyMSN
 
 
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
 
Add to Google Reader or Homepage
 
ARCHIVES January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010
 
 
Media Backspin
« Update: Melbourne window exhibit | Main | AP finds terror »

Wednesday, May 5 2004

AET letter to Bush

One of the big stories yesterday was a letter from sixty former US diplomats to President Bush, criticizing his support for Ariel Sharon:

"By closing the door to negotiations with Palestinians and the possibility of a Palestinian state, you have proved that the U.S. is not an evenhanded peace partner," the letter said.

One of the diplomats quoted by AP even suggested that US difficulties in Iraq were due to US support of Israel:

"Maybe in this year, the disaster that is American intervention in Iraq will finally get through to people, that there is a connection, that the Iraq thing would not have gone so badly if we had been seen in the region as being genuinely interested in upholding the rights and dignity of the Palestinians as well as the Israelis," said Carleton Coon, a former ambassador to Nepal.

Absent from the news stories is the fact that the letter was sponsored by the American Educational Trust, an Arabist lobby group whose affiliate site - Washington Report - includes a counter indicating US aid to Israel, and a slew of articles from the likes of Robert Fisk and Charlie Reese. As David Gerstman says, 'The folks here are hardly dispassionate observers of the Middle East. To call them anti-Israel would be an understatement.'

The US diplomats write they were inspired by a similar letter from British diplomats last week to Tony Blair. Turns out those British diplomats, as reported by the Telegraph, have business links with Arab governments or are paid by pro-Arab organisations -- ties they failed to reveal in their letter.

Both of these elements -- background on the AET, and a disclaimer to the British letter -- should have been included in news reports on the AET-sponsored letter to President Bush.

More on this from LGF, Instapundit, and Roger Simon.

UPDATE: BBC has an article that includes the AET issue, the Jerusalem Post has a very good editorial, and there's a historical angle at NRO.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e200e550343a7a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AET letter to Bush:



 

Comments

More info about the Washington Report: http://middleeast.org/archives/lie2.htm

This week's LIE OF THE WEEK goes to an entire feature section in the publication WASHINGTON REPORT ON MIDDLE EAST AFFAIRS. Published with considerable encouragement and support from the Arab establishment, especially the Saudis, this publication is in actuality a sophisticated propaganda vehicle with the primary purpose of distorting coverage of Middle East affairs in ways to the benefit and liking of the kings, royal families and "client-regimes" who rule, oppress, and squander the resources of the region.

I agree with the President George W.Bush. He is doing the rigth thing to against terrorism. He did the rigth thing that he removed Saddam Hussein. Bush support Israel, which is rigth thing to do. We all have to support Israel,you know. In my opinion, he is a good President.

It is about time that somebody raises voice against the outragious support the U.S. is giving to the genocidal maniacs of Israel. America has become itself a moral monstruosity following Israel's path.
PRV

HR Links


HR Social Media


Featured Blogs


Featured Links

 
Media Backspin