« PA Financiers Starting to Wonder |
Main
| Monitoring Down Under »
Reuters' "Scare" "Quotes"
Each of the following two lines began Nov. 15 Reuters articles. Note which one gets scare quotes, distancing the news agency from the statement from the very start of the article:
From Many Britons Think Bush is Stupid : More than one in three Britons think George W. Bush is stupid and a majority branded the U.S. president a threat to world peace, opinion poll results published have shown .
From Israel Denounces Blasts at Istanbul Synogogues : Israel denounced blasts at Istanbul synagogues that killed at least 20 people on Saturday as "terrorist attacks" and said it was confident Turkey would find those responsible.
.............
Alan Jacobs on scare quotes:
Scare quotes have two functions, the first of which is quite straightforward: They allow their users very easily to express incredulity about, and often contempt for, the views of their political opponents. But they also allow those users to avoid the hard work of thinking up their own descriptions of events or people or ideas. And they're parasitic: They suck all their nourishment from the host words, contributing nothing of their own.
Comments to: editor@reuters.com
Posted at
03:11 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e200e5501fae598833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reuters' "Scare" "Quotes":
» More about "scare quotes" from batesline.com
Oklahoma City blogger Charles G. Hill over at Dustbury http://www.dustbury.com/archives/002387.html>linked to my item about scare quotes in the District 4 City Council race. His first paragraph links to an example of Reuters' use of scare quotes, and t... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 16, 2004 6:56:43 AM
» We're just saying from dustbury.com
So-called "scare quotes" are a useful rhetorical tool, put to use when you'd just as soon distance yourself from what's being said. Reuters, an international "news agency," has a reputation... [Read More]
Tracked on May 30, 2005 6:59:35 AM
[Comments are held for approval before appearing.]
|
